>>100146288>the misuse of the word "free."there is no "misuse". it is quite obvious that i meant "free as in free beer", like most people who aren't mentally ill would agree.
>There is a cost associated, the agreement of a burdensome additional license to download the softwarejust like free beer isn't ackschchually free, because it might result in a headache the next morning? you are a fucking clown.
>They won't stop you from distributing code as that is your GPL right, but doing so violates their EULAall i see in that agreement is about splitting subscription services, nothing about distributing source code
>when you go to renew or acquire a new version they will prevent thisdo you have any documented proof of this actually happening?
>Hence why I use the words "loophole," "legally grey," and "violates the spirit of the agreement."you could have just said "that's just like, my opinion, bro"