>>59999842>The slave owing South had two classes of whites. The insanely rich and the insanely poor.
So?>The slave owners were one of the most wealthy people on earth
They owned firms.
Why weren't their firms the MOST profitable. Why didn't these firms outcompete the northern anti-slavery firms?
Why was the slave owning south so poor?
If it owned slaved, certainly their would have been able to be more productive(and the price of their products and services would be cheaper), no?
Looks like you're horrifically wrong.>These slave operations were not small. Plantations were full of hundreds of slaves.
Again. WHY DID THE NORTH OUTCOMPETE THEM?
This is honestly hilarious. People that understand basic economics understand the answer yet you economically retarded cucks still don't get it. lol>The super majority of whites in the South were not slave owners.
IT DOESN'T MATTER
The same could be said about the north.
The vast majority of people in the north were not capitalists. They were poor workers.
Why did people(includes poor people) in the north have higher living standards than the south?
Why was the north able to lower their prices and have higher living standards for the vast majority of people than the south?