and were telling you that your argument is shit>the appeal of rock is improvisational nature, passion, and wide sonic pallete
congrats youve typed a sentence, please define how you are using the word appeal. as well as the 3 other nebulous terms you threw in>(for me and most people)>most people
citation needed>classical offers dense harmonies that can build up and resolve tension well.
Huh? is that it? And what exactly constitutes a "dense" harmony? What exactly is building up and resolving tension well?>by mixing these you lose some of the energy and passion of rock
Why? What does mixing these things even mean in this context? What does it mean to lose the energy and passion, especially when clearly these must be subjective?
Moreover, the entire basis of your argument implies that progressive rock is supposed to be compared to these standards, which again, you've spent 0 time explaining or defining